What is a doctor's responsibility to an abusive, racist patient?

iStock.com/Kayode Fashola

By Dr Zeshan Qureshi , Professor Mehrunisha Suleman

A violent encounter raises questions that push into morally messy terrain – and challenge what it means to uphold medicine’s ethical ideals.

Doctors are trained to treat whoever comes through the door. The duty of care is often described as unconditional, extending even to those who are frightened, angry, intoxicated, difficult, or openly hostile. Medicine, after all, is built on the idea that care should not depend on whether a patient is polite, grateful, or morally admirable.

But what happens when a patient’s behaviour moves beyond hostility into physical violence, abuse, and potentially criminal behaviour? What happens when the clinician becomes vulnerable?

Some situations strain the ethical ideals medicine asks professionals to uphold

A recent case involving a doctor who struck a cognitively impaired patient after reportedly being racially abused and physically assaulted sparked a media firestorm and intense professional debate. A jury found the doctor guilty of ill-treatment by a care worker. He was sentenced to a year in prison and the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) found him unfit to practise and he was removed from the register.